Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:29
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Want to lower your cholesterol? Try a daily cup of this common bean - The Independent
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Quia quia unde harum qui quas.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Has the current political environment caused Canadians to cancel trips to the United States?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How is a narcissist likely to handle situations when confronted with hard truths about themselves?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
CVS is shutting down 271 stores in 18 states. Is your pharmacy affected? - NJ.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Warming climate may flip the script on the amount of CO₂ released by trees, study finds - Phys.org
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How much can you sell a 10k subscriber newsletter for?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
How do people break a narcissist man's ego?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.